Background Malnutrition is a common finding after major abdominal surgeries especially after prolonged period of fasting in children. Enteral feeding is the commonest support way postoperatively for stimulating gut hormones, modulating immunity, and maintaining the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa. Results This is a prospective cohort study on two groups of patients with a total of 30 patients during the period between January 2019 and June 2020. Conclusion Peptide-based enteral formulas are better tolerated and more useful as regards nutritional status than whole-protein formulas in post-operative course of pediatric patients regarding clinical outcome and better economically with shorter hospital stay.
Mostafa, M. S., Gamal, Y., & Soliman, M. H. (2021). Peptide-based enteral formula vs a whole protein enteral formula after major intestinal surgeries in children. Annals of Pediatric Surgery, 17(1), -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-021-00112-9
MLA
Mohamed Saber Mostafa; Yasmin Gamal; Mohamed H. Soliman. "Peptide-based enteral formula vs a whole protein enteral formula after major intestinal surgeries in children". Annals of Pediatric Surgery, 17, 1, 2021, -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-021-00112-9
HARVARD
Mostafa, M. S., Gamal, Y., Soliman, M. H. (2021). 'Peptide-based enteral formula vs a whole protein enteral formula after major intestinal surgeries in children', Annals of Pediatric Surgery, 17(1), pp. -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-021-00112-9
VANCOUVER
Mostafa, M. S., Gamal, Y., Soliman, M. H. Peptide-based enteral formula vs a whole protein enteral formula after major intestinal surgeries in children. Annals of Pediatric Surgery, 2021; 17(1): -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-021-00112-9
)
View on SCiNiTO